<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Echoes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theadjunct.net/2009/02/05/echoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theadjunct.net/2009/02/05/echoes/</link>
	<description>FULL-TIME THOUGHTS FROM A PART-TIME PROFESSOR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Han</title>
		<link>http://www.theadjunct.net/2009/02/05/echoes/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadjunct.net/?p=66#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Forgot to add that the discussion should center around giving the WORD power...and that we the readers and writers have power OVER words and that you cannot let a word dictate your behavior, but rather, you dictate how the word is used. Controlling words. Purpose of writing...etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to add that the discussion should center around giving the WORD power&#8230;and that we the readers and writers have power OVER words and that you cannot let a word dictate your behavior, but rather, you dictate how the word is used. Controlling words. Purpose of writing&#8230;etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Han</title>
		<link>http://www.theadjunct.net/2009/02/05/echoes/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadjunct.net/?p=66#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I think that further discussion on when and how the word is used (within the context of the classroom) would be good prior to the story. I have also faced this situation, although obviously as an Asian American female, it&#039;s probably not as charged. I set the tone of a discussion on racial slurs prior to any reading of material that contains &quot;the n-word&quot; by eliciting a series of racial/ethnic/homophobic/religious slurs. So, people start volunteering--spic, chink, nigger, chief, wop etc...and as the stuff is called out (I might volunteer &#039;gook&#039;, for example, or &#039;whitey&#039;) people actually start laughing because the list can go on and on and then there&#039;s always the one person who has an extremely LARGE offensive-word vocabulary. This leaves some wondering, how does X know all this, and does X use these words, but nonetheless,once all the words are spoken, written down in the class, it kind of cuts tension. Sometimes there are slurs that I&#039;ve never heard and people have to explain them or spell them out. Maybe I tell them a bit about how one word, like &#039;gook&#039; originated (in Korean war, and means something like &#039;people/country&#039; so that when people are screaming &#039;gook&#039; they are really screaming &#039;country&#039; which sounds ridiculous anyway.) Usually the word list covers half the board and people really get into it.
Then, when we read some work, I think we did a Maya Angelou piece, we can use the word in the context, and I point out before discussion that we will use the word while discussing it. We ocne read that piece Chink by Christine Leong and I even mentioned how it was a generational use because in my age group, I might have had a heart attack if a friend called me a chink--no matter his or her ethnicity. 
Anyway, it is a complicated situation, but above is how I managed to solve the class tension and complication issue with a little humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that further discussion on when and how the word is used (within the context of the classroom) would be good prior to the story. I have also faced this situation, although obviously as an Asian American female, it&#8217;s probably not as charged. I set the tone of a discussion on racial slurs prior to any reading of material that contains &#8220;the n-word&#8221; by eliciting a series of racial/ethnic/homophobic/religious slurs. So, people start volunteering&#8211;spic, chink, nigger, chief, wop etc&#8230;and as the stuff is called out (I might volunteer &#8216;gook&#8217;, for example, or &#8216;whitey&#8217;) people actually start laughing because the list can go on and on and then there&#8217;s always the one person who has an extremely LARGE offensive-word vocabulary. This leaves some wondering, how does X know all this, and does X use these words, but nonetheless,once all the words are spoken, written down in the class, it kind of cuts tension. Sometimes there are slurs that I&#8217;ve never heard and people have to explain them or spell them out. Maybe I tell them a bit about how one word, like &#8216;gook&#8217; originated (in Korean war, and means something like &#8216;people/country&#8217; so that when people are screaming &#8216;gook&#8217; they are really screaming &#8216;country&#8217; which sounds ridiculous anyway.) Usually the word list covers half the board and people really get into it.<br />
Then, when we read some work, I think we did a Maya Angelou piece, we can use the word in the context, and I point out before discussion that we will use the word while discussing it. We ocne read that piece Chink by Christine Leong and I even mentioned how it was a generational use because in my age group, I might have had a heart attack if a friend called me a chink&#8211;no matter his or her ethnicity.<br />
Anyway, it is a complicated situation, but above is how I managed to solve the class tension and complication issue with a little humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

